Archive for the ‘News’ Category

posted by admin on Jan 25

http://timescolonist.com/business/Houses+planned+Langford+farmland/2479162/story.htm

TIMES COLONIST
JANUARY 24, 2010

Langford council is considering a proposal for a 501-unit housing development on land now zoned for agriculture.

The municipality’s planning committee will consider a staff report tomorrow on a development calling for 102 single-family lots, 61 townhouses and 338 apartments on the approximately 14 hectares at 936 Flatman Ave.

At least part of the property is in the Agricultural Land Reserve, which means the land use can’t be changed without approval from the provincial Agricultural Land Commission. The approval is critical for the development’s road access.

The report suggests councillors hold off until the Agricultural Land Commission weighs in.

posted by admin on Jan 25

Langford’s plans to sell parks

A very small area of Langford is facing the disposition of two portions of parkland on Florence Lake. A counter-petition is ongoing and if you are eligible to vote in elections, please download the 2 petition forms, sign them, and return to City hall by Dec. 30th

Elector Multi-Response Form, Bylaw No. 1252 (Shaw Avenue Tot Lot)

Elector Multi-Response Form, Bylaw No. 1253 (lot adjacent to 918 Gade Road)

More info: Guest editorial: Langford’s plans to sell parks


posted by admin on Dec 14

By Edward Hill – Goldstream News Gazette
Published: December 03, 2009 1:00 PM
Langford is looking to buff up breathing room between urban development and remaining farmland as part of an agricultural strategy released in November.
A key provision of the strategy is establishing an agricultural development permit area, which would prescribe setbacks and buffer areas between farmland and residential development.
“We want to make the most of what we have,” said Coun. Lillian Szpak, chair of planning and zoning. “It’s about edge planning to ensure the optimal use of urban and agricultural boundaries. It’s so they can live side by side.”
Agricultural DP areas would span 100 metres from existing provincial agricultural land reserve and would require a professional plan for landscaping, stormwater management and building setback, among other requirements.
Langford has about 118 hectares of ALR land in 83 parcels. Eight parcels totalling 7.2 hectares are seeking exclusion from the ALR through the provincial agricultural land commission.
“Once adopted, every development next to agricultural land will be a (development permit) area,” said Matthew Baldwin, Langford’s city planner. “We want to protect land in the ALR by determining how land adjacent to land in the ALR develops.”
The strategy outlines a broad series of initiatives, such as establishing a “public trust” of secured agricultural land, either donated or purchased by the City, and then leased to farmers. Langford has had a developer amenity fee for ALR land acquisition since 2006, but is yet to buy farmland.
Langford also plans to amend its landscaping policy to require edible plant species, allow all commercial and industrial zones to host farmers markets and require developments with at least 100 units per hectare to provide community gardens.
Langford still needs to draft and pass a number of bylaws to bring these initiatives into force. Baldwin doesn’t expect a bylaw for the agricultural DP area to come before council until early next year.
Ultimately, the City’s goal is to promote awareness about food security, farm markets and small-scale farming, Szpak said. The strategy report admits Langford has “very little farmland,” but Szpak said through the public trust, the City wants to preserve what viable soil remains.
“We’re at a time in the world and in the community were food self-reliance is an issue with a lot of interest,” she said. “We are an urban area with rural lands that we’re looking to live in concert with.”
Residents’ anxiety in the Happy Valley area has risen as some properties look to escape the ALR, while others transition from large-lot to higher-density developments. Szpak agreed people should be concerned about preserving farmland, but noted that landowners have a right to try and subdivide and that not all land is farmable.
“Agricultural land is precious. That is the whole reason behind this initiative,” she said. “But we need a balanced approach. If the land is viable we want to keep it for farming.”
A group of Langford green-thumbs, coined Green Langford working group, are helping put on a CR-Fair roundtable next week to talk about Langford’s agricultural strategy.
Bea McKenzie, an avid garlic gardener, said local food producers have plenty of questions about the strategy, which they hope to put to Langford politicians and staff.
McKenzie said she wants to make sure the land acquisition fund doesn’t alienate small farmers.
The CR-Fair roundtable is Monday, Dec. 7, 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the Langford legion, 761 Station Ave.

http://www.bclocalnews.com/vancouver_island_south/goldstreamgazette/news/78375837.html

By Edward Hill – Goldstream News Gazette

Published: December 03, 2009 1:00 PM

Langford is looking to buff up breathing room between urban development and remaining farmland as part of an agricultural strategy released in November.

A key provision of the strategy is establishing an agricultural development permit area, which would prescribe setbacks and buffer areas between farmland and residential development.

“We want to make the most of what we have,” said Coun. Lillian Szpak, chair of planning and zoning. “It’s about edge planning to ensure the optimal use of urban and agricultural boundaries. It’s so they can live side by side.”

Agricultural DP areas would span 100 metres from existing provincial agricultural land reserve and would require a professional plan for landscaping, stormwater management and building setback, among other requirements.

Langford has about 118 hectares of ALR land in 83 parcels. Eight parcels totalling 7.2 hectares are seeking exclusion from the ALR through the provincial agricultural land commission.

“Once adopted, every development next to agricultural land will be a (development permit) area,” said Matthew Baldwin, Langford’s city planner. “We want to protect land in the ALR by determining how land adjacent to land in the ALR develops.”

The strategy outlines a broad series of initiatives, such as establishing a “public trust” of secured agricultural land, either donated or purchased by the City, and then leased to farmers. Langford has had a developer amenity fee for ALR land acquisition since 2006, but is yet to buy farmland.

Langford also plans to amend its landscaping policy to require edible plant species, allow all commercial and industrial zones to host farmers markets and require developments with at least 100 units per hectare to provide community gardens.

Langford still needs to draft and pass a number of bylaws to bring these initiatives into force. Baldwin doesn’t expect a bylaw for the agricultural DP area to come before council until early next year.

Ultimately, the City’s goal is to promote awareness about food security, farm markets and small-scale farming, Szpak said. The strategy report admits Langford has “very little farmland,” but Szpak said through the public trust, the City wants to preserve what viable soil remains.

“We’re at a time in the world and in the community were food self-reliance is an issue with a lot of interest,” she said. “We are an urban area with rural lands that we’re looking to live in concert with.”

Residents’ anxiety in the Happy Valley area has risen as some properties look to escape the ALR, while others transition from large-lot to higher-density developments. Szpak agreed people should be concerned about preserving farmland, but noted that landowners have a right to try and subdivide and that not all land is farmable.

“Agricultural land is precious. That is the whole reason behind this initiative,” she said. “But we need a balanced approach. If the land is viable we want to keep it for farming.”

A group of Langford green-thumbs, coined Green Langford working group, are helping put on a CR-Fair roundtable next week to talk about Langford’s agricultural strategy.

Bea McKenzie, an avid garlic gardener, said local food producers have plenty of questions about the strategy, which they hope to put to Langford politicians and staff.

McKenzie said she wants to make sure the land acquisition fund doesn’t alienate small farmers.

The CR-Fair roundtable is Monday, Dec. 7, 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the Langford legion, 761 Station Ave.

posted by admin on Dec 6

http://www.timescolonist.com/business/eases+farm+rules/2280630/story.html

B.C. eases farm-tax rules

Provincial government moves to encourage small-scale operations

BY SCOTT SIMPSON, WITH FILES FROM JOANNE HATHERLY, CANWEST NEWS SERVICE

NOVEMBER 28, 2009

Bill Bennett says higher taxes discouraged keeping land for agriculture.
Photograph by: Darren Stone, Times Colonist, Canwest News Service
The provincial government is eliminating controversial property-tax regulations on farmland to encourage development of more small-scale farms, Community and Rural Development Minister Bill Bennett announced yesterday.

So-called split assessments, which tax farmland at a lower agricultural rate but apply higher residential tax rates to undeveloped areas and home footprints on the same property, were deemed as deterring expansion of farming.

The revised rules compel local governments to tax entire properties at the lower agricultural rate if at least half the land is devoted to farming, or if at least 25 per cent of the land generates a specified minimum amount of income from farming for the landowner.

A primary reason for the change is to support more development of small-scale agriculture on the Saanich peninsula, Bennett said.

Jack Mar, Central Saanich mayor and longtime farmer, has mixed feelings about the new rules, however.

“The pro is it will take away the bureaucracy that small farmers have had to deal with,” said Marr, who grows fruit and vegetables on 55 hectares.

But Mar is concerned the low farm-income threshold of $3,500 could enable a homeowner on a half-acre residential property who sets up a flower stand at the end of the driveway to qualify as a farm. That could lead to reduced revenues for municipalities.

Marr said residential land is taxed at a rate 10 times greater than farm land. One property that Marr purchased had an annual tax bill of $200 when zoned for agricultural use, but $2,500 when zoned for residential.

Metro Vancouver’s regional government is concerned that elimination of the split assessment will open the door to unchecked monster-home construction on viable agricultural land.

It is also concerned that the change will force municipal governments to hike property-tax “mill” rates on all agricultural land in order to recoup tax revenue that will be lost, to the detriment of active farmers.

“We are concerned that removal of the split classification without some other means of limiting the size of the houses, could actually encourage construction of larger houses in agricultural areas,” said Richmond Coun. Harold Steves, chairman of Metro Vancouver’s agriculture committee. “This would particularly apply in Pitt Meadows, Maple Ridge, through the Fraser Valley and in Richmond as well. It has hit us in Richmond already.”

Neither the province’s July 2009 Farm Assessment Review Panel report nor Metro Vancouver’s review of that report specify the number of farms that will benefit from the changes, or the amount of property-tax revenue that municipal governments will lose as a result of the changes.

The B.C. Agriculture Council has argued that not all of a given farm property may be suited to agriculture — citing uneven land, riparian areas around streams and buffer zones between properties.

Bennett said farmers hit with higher residential tax rates for parts of their properties were increasingly looking to develop it for residential use.

“We want to make it easier for people to do small-scale agriculture, not harder,” Bennett said.

He added that the government’s review panel heard ” dozens and dozens” of stories from farmers who said it was difficult to stay in business and “one of the problems was the value of the property taxes they were charged.”

posted by admin on Jun 21

By Zoe Blunt

June 2009
Langford’s farmers, food lovers, and political bodies are struggling with the dilemma of farmland preservation

Along Bilston Creek, fat mallards flap and quack over a willow thicket and red-winged blackbirds perch on cattails to sing their spring songs. Nearby fields are dotted with blackberries, horse paddocks, and hay bales. But public notices on Happy Valley Road warn that new housing developments are on the horizon, and these farmlands and wetlands are getting squeezed by creeping urbanization. For years, Langford’s fastgrowth policies have put the city squarely at odds with local food and farming advocates.

Read full article here…